Justice Department Issues Additional Subpoenas in Investigation To Trump Electors

Wednesday saw the distribution of subpoenas by federal investigators looking into the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, expanding their investigation into the use of invalid electors by pro-President Donald Trump activists to obstruct Joe Biden’s election triumph in 2020.

The FBI verified that agents carried out court-approved law enforcement efforts on Wednesday morning at various sites. One of them was the residence of Georgia lawyer Brad Carver, who allegedly signed a form declaring himself to be a Trump elector.

The second was Thomas Lane’s residence in Virginia, where he worked on the Trump campaign’s initiatives in Arizona and New Mexico. Although public records show each of the sites as the men’s homes, FBI officials did not name the people connected to those locations.

According to persons acquainted with the inquiry, David Shafer, the chairman of the Georgia Republican Party and a Trump elector in that state, was one of those who issued a subpoena on Wednesday. Shafer’s attorney chose not to comment.

Additionally, according to an individual who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss an existing inquiry, at minimum a few of the potential Trump electors in Michigan received subpoenas. However, it was unclear right away if that action was connected to a federal investigation or a state-level criminal probe.

It was not immediately obvious what detailed information the Justice Department was looking for at the houses of Carver and Lane.

Also Read: Senators Strike An Agreement On Gun Safety Legislation That Is Bipartisan


Trump and others thought that fraudulent electors may be accepted by state lawmakers in a last-ditch effort to retain Trump in the White House, according to officials who have previously indicated that the Justice Department and the FBI were looking into the problem.

The subpoenas approved on Wednesday recommend the Justice Department is now shifting to interrogate at least some of those who were supposedly keen to undertake the effort. Up until this point, even so, those investigative attempts just seem to primarily entail talking with people in Republican circles who knew about the system and opposed it.

It was not immediately clear what specific details the Justice Department was looking for at the houses of Carver and Lane.

As per the individual who spoke on the condition of anonymity regarding an active investigation, FBI agents served Lane with a subpoena on Wednesday morning at his house in Virginia. Lane has reportedly worked on the Virginia election campaigns of the Republican National Committee since quitting the Trump campaign.

At the Arizona Republican Party’s Dec. 14 alternate elector signing event in Phoenix, a video shared online in 2020 purports to show Lane distributing papers for electors.

Lane did not immediately respond to messages left on her phone. The Georgia attorney Carver also did not immediately answer messages requesting comment. A location for Lane is shown in public records as being in south Arlington, and an FBI spokesperson acknowledged that on Wednesday morning, agents carried out “court-authorized law enforcement operations” there.

Read More: Amber Heard Appeals Jury Decision In Favor Of Johnny Depp

The Justice Department’s latest investigative actions coincide with a number of high-profile committee testimony looking into the Capitol riot as well as Trump’s attempts to sabotage Biden’s election win by using fictitious electors, lobbying the Justice Department, and bogus allegations of illegal voting.

Officials from Arizona and Georgia spoke to the House Select Committee on Tuesday about the campaigns that Trump and his closest associates had started against both states. Former Justice Department officials will testify in front of the committee during its session on Thursday. According to three people participating in the congressional investigation into threats made on Jan. 6, there has been an increase in the number of violent threats made against members of that panel.

The Justice Department submitted subpoenas earlier this year and requested conversations with some of the 15 persons across the nation who were supposed to be electors for Trump if he had won their states, but who was allegedly replaced by other Trump fans on the day of the electoral college vote.

Republicans who weren’t electors for the election told The Washington Post that they didn’t do so because Biden had won the popular vote in their state and they didn’t even think the meetings were proper; other Republicans said they couldn’t attend due to illness or other obligations.

Former Pennsylvania congressman Tom Marino (R), one of the first members of Congress to support Trump’s presidential campaign, Georgia real estate investor John Isakson, the son of the late Republican Senator Johnny Isakson, and election legal scholar Lawrence Tabas were one of were those who declined to take part. Tabas had attempted to defend Trump in 2016 vs a recount attempt by Green Party candidate Jill Stein.

Those previous subpoenas demanded the production of all records relating to the electoral college vote since October 1, 2020, as well as all correspondence with approximately a dozen members of Trump’s innermost circle, such as Rudy Giuliani, Bernard Kerik, Boris Epshteyn, Jenna Ellis, and John Eastman, regarding the election.

Patrick Gartland, a potential Trump elector in Georgia, claimed that because he had been assigned to the Cobb County Board of Elections and Registration, his elective office would have presented a potential conflict of interest. But two FBI investigators recently visited his house with a subpoena and inquired about whether he had any interactions with Trump officials before the election in November. They inquired as to whether Gartland had spoken with Giuliani.


The public’s pressure on the Justice Department to vigorously prosecute Trump and his associates for their actions in the lead-up to January 6 has risen as a result of the proceedings on Capitol Hill.

Senior Justice Department authorities have, however, also started complaining to the panel that investigators need entry to the transcripts of more than 1,000 private committee interview sessions and claimed that the ongoing court case of five members of the Proud Boys extremist group suspected of seditious conspiracy for their alleged involvement in the riot is jeopardized if those transcripts are not available. On Wednesday, the federal court presiding over that case ordered a further adjournment of the case, this time until August 8.

The Justice Department has now filed charges against more than 820 people for their alleged involvement in the assault on January 6, making this the biggest investigation in departmental history. There are hundreds more people wanted.

By serving subpoenas on those engaged in the planning for the event preceding the unrest, the prosecution dramatically broadened its probe previously this year.

Also: What If You Develop Allergy After Eating Meat?

Leave a Comment